February 13, 2025 First Person Love, Beyond Recognition By Benjamin Ehrlich Marc Lehwald, The Mirror Project, Keukenhof, the Netherlands, 2014, via Wikimedia Commons. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 DE. My very first memory takes place at the local Blockbuster store, where I went one night with my father to rent a movie. I was four or five years old. He let me run ahead of him through the aisles, and I remember a rare, if not completely novel, feeling of independence. Turning a corner, I saw a man wearing glasses and light-wash jeans, with a brown beard and brown hair, standing with his back toward me, facing the shelves. He looked exactly like my father. I hugged him around his legs. When the man turned around, I realized that he was not my father but rather another man, a stranger, whom I had mistaken for my father. And the stranger seemed displeased with my affection. I exploded into tears. This is not only my first memory but also my first experience of terror. Lately, I have been having nightmares in which my ex-girlfriend J.—whom I was with, off and on, for more than ten years—treats me like a stranger. These dreams are so disturbing that I wake up from them in the middle of the night. I write them in my journal as soon as possible: Read More
February 11, 2025 First Person Briefly a Hawk By Sam McPhee Photograph by Sam McPhee. I live with my family in the mountains of western Montana, near the small railroad town of Alberton. A week ago I found a dead hawk on my front porch. Flight feathers and bristle had been torn from the body, and scatters of down were fluttering in place or tumbling away, light as ash. But there was no blood anywhere, not even on the carcass. My five-year-old daughter, June, was there with me. We were on our way out to the car, on our way to school. The morning sunlight was rich and cold. Then I saw a tiny down feather dabbed to the pane of one of our front windows. A point of impact. How sad, June said. Yes. It’s rare to see a hawk up close, I told her. We looked at the bird for a moment, as if to pay it our respects. When I returned home an hour later, the hawk was still there on the porch. No scavenger had come for it. I called a taxidermist in Frenchtown. He was driving when he answered my call, and his truck was full of wind. He shouted his hello. I asked him if he did birds, and he said, Yeah, laughing to himself, I do birds. But when I told him the bird was a hawk, he said, Let me stop you right there. I can’t touch that bird. You can’t touch it, either. I told him that it flew into my window. The hawk will just go to waste, I said. He was quiet for a moment. Then he said, I would love to do it for you, and his voice was different now, almost mournful. But I can’t touch a hawk. Read More
February 10, 2025 Rereading The Erotics of (Re)reading By Peter Szendy John La Farge, The Relation of the Individual to the State, 1905. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. Plato’s Phaedrus begins at the edge of the city of Athens, in the countryside, as we would say today. Enter Socrates and Phaedrus, his younger friend. Phaedrus has just come from the house of Lysias, his master and erastēs (older male lover). SOCRATES: Dear Phaedrus, wither away, and where do you come from? PHAEDRUS: From Lysias, Socrates … and I am going for a walk outside the wall [of Athens]. Earlier that day, Phaedrus says, Lysias had given him a speech in which he described the erotic relationship that a master can have with a young disciple whom he does not love, with whom he is not in love. PHAEDRUS: Lysias has represented one of the beauties being tempted, but not by a lover; this is just the clever thing about it; for he says that favors should be granted rather to the one who is not in love than to the lover. This report does not satisfy Socrates. Dying to know more, he is determined not to let Phaedrus out of his sight; he will follow him everywhere, hound him until he agrees to read Lysias’s speech to him. At the very threshold of the reading scene there thus emerges a close and complex connection between loving and reading, two verbs, two gerunds, between which, for reasons that will soon become apparent, it makes sense to leave open all the possible punctuation marks, including the possibility that there be none (as though one wrote them in scriptio continua, with no space between them, which was a common scriptural practice in Plato’s day). Loving()reading could then be read (or connected) at least in two different ways: 1. Lovingreading or loving-reading (a double verb, conjugated as transitive, where what one loves-reads is someone or something, Lysias or the book). 2. Loving reading (in which case, it is reading that one loves). Read More
February 7, 2025 On Books The Image of the Doll: Tove Ditlevsen’s Worn-Out Language By Olga Ravn Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. While I write this, my husband is cycling through the rain, taking our one-year-old son, who last night yet again wouldn’t sleep, to nursery school, and I am thinking of Tove Ditlevsen’s poems. I, too, want to write lists of my quirks, vices, unattractive traits, that which is me but is not me. Those I love but don’t love. What I ought to do and be, but neither do nor am. Reading these poems, which were written between 1939 and 1976, I realized that Tove Ditlevsen’s poetry is always about the discrepancy between who I ought to be and who I am (which leads to the inevitable awkward moment in so many of Ditlevsen’s poems). Take, for instance, “The Eternal Three,” where love is not the exalted union of two souls; rather, one is always in love with the wrong person. Or “Self-Portrait 1,” where Ditlevsen lists what she can and cannot do: “I cannot: cook / pull off a hat / entertain company … I can: be alone / do the dishes / read books.” Or “Warning”: where the heart “can only dream, not yearn / for what exists in light of day.” In these poems there is so often a longing for something that is not, something that was, something that could be. Read More
February 6, 2025 On Children's Books Room, Moon, Moon, Balloon: Reading and Breathing By Jamieson Webster Berthe Morisot, Le berceau (detail), 1872, via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain. I have read Goodnight Moon to my daughter over and over since she was an infant. Its long, drawn-out goodnight to everything in that surreal green room for a little rabbit in blue striped pajamas. Margaret Wise Brown is a special children’s book writer, psychoanalytically inspired, educated at the revolutionary Bank Street School in New York City where apparently she went too far for even their sensibilities. A New Yorker profile notes her tendency toward extremes going all the way back. “She was a tomboy with a terrible temper … When Brown became angry she sometimes held her breath until she turned blue, prompting a nanny to plunge her head into a tub of ice-cold water.” Brown’s fantastical, wild, and brief life befits the Modernist poetics of her writing, hidden in the simplest of stories. She changed children’s literature, and, like a good psychoanalyst, she claims she was mere “eye and ear” for the children who were the real writers of her stories. “Goodnight room, goodnight moon. Goodnight cow jumping over the moon. Goodnight light and the red balloon. Goodnight cow jumping over the moon.” At face value, a simple set of rhymes and repetitions: room, moon, moon, balloon, and night, night, night, light, night. However, Brown manages to evoke the transition from object to sound and image, because who would fail to hear the moo of the cow jumping over the moon, or the transition of night as goodnight light. And who would not think of the balloon in the room, rising in the air, like the moon in the sky outside. The moon outside is shown in the window in the room, while the cow jumping over the moon is a picture in the pictured room. This is a subtle didactic lesson, to be sure. It speaks the way a child navigates reality as space, air, breath, object, sound, words, jumping from images that are real to imaginary ones in picture books. Also, how these qualities permeate one another, forming a world of associations. All that is seen and named and heard, we must say goodnight to—a version of goodbye—when going to sleep. How does the child know what will be there when it wakes up? The book reassures continuation. Reading the book, night after night, is an enactment of that continuation. Continue reading, continue saying goodnight, continue finding the world still there after your brief absence from it. Read More
February 5, 2025 The Review’s Review New Theater, New York, January 2025 By Rhoda Feng Dead as a Dodo. Photograph by Erato Tzavara. For two weeks at the beginning of January in New York, a cluster of theater festivals—including Under the Radar, Prototype, the Exponential Festival, and PhysFestNYC—stage a confetti cannon’s worth of experimental shows. This year, the first two festivals ended January 19, though some works have been extended into February. Past years have taught me to set modest expectations about intake. I wouldn’t be able to see every show, but many are short enough that you could, if you really wanted to, play calendar Tetris and squeeze two or even five into one day, as I did one Saturday. (Ticket prices also tend to be less prohibitively expensive than shows on Broadway or even sometimes Off Broadway.) The back-to-back scheduling made for a brutal schlep, but it was worth it: During my first week in New York, I saw, among other things, a group of Russian refugee children proclaiming their love for Sarah Jessica Parker in SpaceBridge, a loose confederation of young radicals plotting yes-man-like acts of subterfuge against corporate juggernauts in Eat the Document, and a small sphere lingering ectoplasmically above a group of harmonizing humanoid rats. This last show, Symphony of Rats, was produced by the Wooster Group and can be considered an honorary rather than official part of the festival circuit. The late Richard Foreman, who conceived the show, hovers like that electric-blue ball over much avant-garde theater. (Witness the use of voice-over or television clips or fourth-wall-pulverizing techniques currently in theatrical vogue.) As with previous festivals, there were hits and misses … and more than a few shows “under construction” and therefore closed to review. Not everything was to my taste: Ann Liv Young’s Marie Antoinette, in which the artist berates two mentally ill collaborators and plays punitively loud music quickly wore out its provocative welcome. Another show about a man in Tehran and his imprisoned political-prisoner wife was more soporific than its subject matter seemed to promise. I also managed to be turned away by a few shows (in one case, twice by the same show!) for showing up ten minutes late, on the heels of another performance. So much for my Icarian itinerary. The 7th Voyage of Egon Tichy. Photograph by Maria Baranova. One of the first shows I saw was a redux that caused me to quarrel with my own four-years-earlier interpretation of it. The 7th Voyage of Egon Tichy, staged at New York Theatre Workshop’s Fourth Street Theatre, is adapted from Stanisław Lem’s time-looping tale of the same name, and originated as a filmed in its actor’s modestly sized home closet. Its premise: Egon Tichy, a hapless cosmonaut, finds himself stranded in a malfunctioning spaceship after being struck off course by “a meteor the size of a lima bean.” As his ship’s computer informs him, realigning the craft’s rudder requires two people—a cruel cosmic joke on the solitary spaceman. Happily, some of Egon’s future selves are soon manifested via a “time vortex” and take up residence in the bathroom, library, sleeping quarter, and other modular areas. Unhappily, these selves (who take their names from different days of the week) quickly turn on each other as each one attempts to assert the primacy of his own identity and keep a fingerhold on reality. The variant Egons are projected on large screens, and Joshua William Gelb, the actor who plays all versions of the cosmonaut, delivers a memorable Chaplinesque performance as he engages with his alternates through timed videography. Frying pan duels aside, the Egons’ arguments about selfhood are eminently relatable. Watching Gelb inchworm across his cramped quarters and bicker with other Egons, I relished the panache with which the show fully commits to the contingency of identity. The Black Lodge. Photograph by Maria Baranova. Michael Joseph McQuilken and David T. Little’s “goth industrial rock opera” Black Lodge, commissioned by Beth Morrison Projects and the Allen R. and Judy Brick Freedman Venture Fund for Opera, steers us through a series of haunting mindscapes. In one, a man plays a deadly game of Russian roulette with his lover. In another, the same man is slowly mummified in clay and skewered by the woman (now dressed in a doctor’s uniform) with ethereal twigs. An unsettling scene of black-lipped, bandaged men in a desert repeats, turning up like an unlucky penny. The vignettes, which unfold on a cinema screen behind a group of live performers (the band Timur and the Dime Museum along with the Isaura String Quartet), all seem to orbit the man’s abiding regret over killing his beloved. The performance artist Timur, who plays the nameless man, wears a passport expression throughout much of the show, as if in a trance or daymare. McQuilken, the director, has said that he sought to “movie a score” instead of scoring a movie, and it works: the visual montages power the opera’s music, which wheels from berceuse to nu-metal fury to the hypnotic. Earplugs are provided. When Raymond Chandler wrote, in The Big Sleep, that “the world was a wet emptiness,” he could have been describing the atmosphere of Dead as a Dodo, a dazzlingly inventive puppet show produced by the theater company Wakka Wakka. The eighty-minute show conjures an allegory from the depths of a shadowy void, where every sound seems to echo into an infinite abyss. The only sources of light are the glowing orbs of two pairs of eyes, belonging to a skeletal boy and a dodo. We follow this boy and his avian companion as they traverse a desolate realm in search of replacement bones for the boy, who is missing a leg and preemptively lamenting his own imminent “disappearance.” They encounter red spaghettilike scavengers, a hungry iridescent whale, a giant purple worm, and the Bone King, a cigar-chomping figure—half washed-up rock star, half mobster—who presides over the Bone Realm along with his eerie daughter. The production excels in its visual storytelling, blending intricate puppetry with the skillful use of light and shadow. One standout sequence immerses the audience in the River Styx: undulating sheets of plastic become waves, drawing viewers into an otherworldly underwater pursuit. It manages to be subtle and even, maybe, hopeful: as the boy and the dodo struggle to escape their nemeses, the bird begins sprouting feathers. Rhoda Feng is a freelance critic whose work has appeared in 4Columns, Artforum, The Times Literary Supplement, frieze, The Nation, and The New York Times.