Advertisement
The Paris Review
Subscribe
Sign In
Remember me
Forgot password?
Sign In
Subscribe
The Daily
The Latest
Columns
The Quarterly
Issues
Interviews
Fiction
Poetry
Letters & Essays
Art & Photo
graphy
Authors
Podcast
About
History
Opportunities
Masthead
Prizes
Submissions
Media Kit
Bookstores
Events
Donate
Donate to
The Paris Review
Institutional Support
THE SPRING REVEL
Newsletters
Store
The Paris Review
The Daily
The Latest
Columns
The Quarterly
Issues
Interviews
Fiction
Poetry
Letters & Essays
Art & Photography
Authors
Podcast
About
History
Opportunities
Masthead
Prizes
Submissions
Media Kit
Bookstores
Events
Donate
Donate to
The Paris Review
Institutional Support
THE SPRING REVEL
Newsletters
Store
Sign In
Remember me
Forgot password?
Sign In
Subscribe
Sign In
Remember Me
Forgot password?
Substituting Russian Literature for Sex Ed, and Other News
By
Justin Alvarez
September 20, 2013
On the Shelf
Film still from
Anna Karenina
(1935).
“Jonathan Franzen gripe” or “YouTube comment about saggy pants”?
You be the judge
.
Forget condoms and turn instead to Chekhov, Tolstoy, and Gogol, according to a Russian children’s ombudsman.
Says Pavel Astakhov
, “The best sex education that exists is Russian literature.”
The little-known original ending of “The Frog Prince” (spoiler: there was no kiss) sheds insight on
why the Brothers Grimm were so grim
.
A
Stanford University study
shows evidence that today’s kids are actually writing longer and better essays than people in Twitter-less 1917. However, according to a recent
Pew Research poll of teachers
, children are also writing too informally.
A defense of
buying books and never reading them
.
Last / Next
Article
Last / Next Article
Share