The Daily

Arts & Culture

C. S. Lewis Reviews The Hobbit, 1937

November 19, 2013 | by

hobbit-cover-large

A world for children: J. R. R. Tolkien,

The Hobbit: or There and Back Again

(London: Allen and Unwin, 1937)

The publishers claim that The Hobbit, though very unlike Alice, resembles it in being the work of a professor at play. A more important truth is that both belong to a very small class of books which have nothing in common save that each admits us to a world of its own—a world that seems to have been going on long before we stumbled into it but which, once found by the right reader, becomes indispensable to him. Its place is with Alice, Flatland, Phantastes, The Wind in the Willows. [1]

To define the world of The Hobbit is, of course, impossible, because it is new. You cannot anticipate it before you go there, as you cannot forget it once you have gone. The author’s admirable illustrations and maps of Mirkwood and Goblingate and Esgaroth give one an inkling—and so do the names of the dwarf and dragon that catch our eyes as we first ruffle the pages. But there are dwarfs and dwarfs, and no common recipe for children’s stories will give you creatures so rooted in their own soil and history as those of Professor Tolkien—who obviously knows much more about them than he needs for this tale. Still less will the common recipe prepare us for the curious shift from the matter-of-fact beginnings of his story (“hobbits are small people, smaller than dwarfs—and they have no beards—but very much larger than Lilliputians”) [2] to the saga-like tone of the later chapters (“It is in my mind to ask what share of their inheritance you would have paid to our kindred had you found the hoard unguarded and us slain”). [3] You must read for yourself to find out how inevitable the change is and how it keeps pace with the hero’s journey. Though all is marvellous, nothing is arbitrary: all the inhabitants of Wilderland seem to have the same unquestionable right to their existence as those of our own world, though the fortunate child who meets them will have no notion—and his unlearned elders not much more—of the deep sources in our blood and tradition from which they spring.

For it must be understood that this is a children’s book only in the sense that the first of many readings can be undertaken in the nursery. Alice is read gravely by children and with laughter by grown ups; The Hobbit, on the other hand, will be funnier to its youngest readers, and only years later, at a tenth or a twentieth reading, will they begin to realise what deft scholarship and profound reflection have gone to make everything in it so ripe, so friendly, and in its own way so true. Prediction is dangerous: but The Hobbit may well prove a classic.

Review published in the Times Literary Supplement (2 October 1937), 714.

 

1. Flatland (1884) is by Edwin A. Abbott, Phantastes by George MacDonald (1858).

2. The Hobbit: or There and Back Again (1937), chapter 1.

3. Ibid., chapter 15.

Image and Imagination: Essays and Reviews, by C. S. Lewis, edited by Walter Hooper. Copyright © 2013 C. S. Lewis Pte Ltd. Reprinted with the permission of Cambridge University Press.

This article originally appeared in the Times Literary Supplement. Click here to read it on the TLS site.

 

29 COMMENTS

3 Comments

  1. Thomas | November 19, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    I love that Lewis gives us an “inkling” of the literary-fantasy guild, of which he was a member along with Tolkien at Oxford.

  2. David | November 20, 2013 at 1:45 am

    I too chuckled at that little gem. Nobody writes like those two anymore.

  3. cosplayfan | January 15, 2014 at 4:36 am

    Em, firstly, I feel great honored to see your beautiful article here. I love it very much. Sometimes, I even want to try to play my loved roles in the cosplay shows when I see so many The Hobbit fans buying their favorite cosplay costumes and accessories in the online stores, such as Fandomsky; Moviescostume and other stores to act as their loved characters in the cosplay shows. That is really cool and impressive.

26 Pingbacks

  1. […] C.S. Lewis’ review of The […]

  2. […] via Paris Review – C. S. Lewis Reviews The Hobbit, 1937, C.s. Lewis. […]

  3. […] Want to know what else Lewis had to say? Read the rest of the review over at the Paris Review. […]

  4. […] C. S. Lewis Reviews The Hobbit, 1937 “For it must be understood that this is a children’s book only in the sense that the first of many readings can be undertaken in the nursery.” […]

  5. […] Lewis reviewed The Hobbit…in […]

  6. […] beware, these looked okay at first, some were lumpy as other reviews stated. But after a few days the silver literally rubbed off leaving gold spots on the beads. I […]

  7. […] C. S. Lewis Reviews The Hobbit, 1937 — A nice blast from the past. He might have been on to something: “Prediction is dangerous: but The Hobbit may well prove a classic.” […]

  8. […] C.S. Lewis Reviews The Hobbit […]

  9. […] What did C.S. Lewis think about The Hobbit? What did he say about G.K. Chesterton? All of the known audio of him speaking is now complied at one place. Here are tips to writing from Lewis. A video from the Colson Center gives an introduction to Lewis for those who may not be sure about him. Paris Review: Lewis was a huge fan and supporter of J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy works. He even nominated Tolkien for a Nobel Prize in literature. Here Lewis reviews The Hobbit and closes by saying: “Prediction is dangerous: but The Hobbit may well prove a classic.” […]

  10. […] via Paris Review – C. S. Lewis Reviews The Hobbit, 1937, C.s. Lewis. […]

  11. […] and a brilliant writer in his own right (see The Chronicles of Narnia and Til We Have Faces), reviewed The Hobbit in 1937 (Times Literary Supplement (2 October 1937), 714). In his review, he praises […]

Leave a Comment