\nThere must be sorrow if there can be love. \u2014From \u201cCanzone\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Ah, the fabled sixties and seventies! Jack Kerouac and William Burroughs! The glorious advent of Howling! Of Getting Stoned! The proliferation of Ginsbergian Exclamation Points! To secure the status of their literary subversion, these revolutionary decades were obliged, like the cadres of every insurrection, to denigrate and despise, and sometimes to blow up, their immediate predecessor, the fifties\u2014the middling middle, the very navel, of the twentieth century. The fifties, after all, were the Eisenhower years, stiff and small like Mamie\u2019s bangs (and just as dated), dully mediocre, constrained, consumerist, car-finned, conformist, forgettable, and stale as modernism itself. Randall Jarrell, one of its leading poets and critics, named this midcentury epoch \u201cThe Age of Criticism\u201d\u2014and what, however he intended it, could suggest prosiness more? And what is prosiness if not the negation of the lively, the living, the lasting, the daring, the true and the new? The reality was sublimely opposite. It was, in fact, the Age of Poetry, a pinnacle and an exaltation; there has not been another since. Its poets were more than luminaries\u2014they were colossi, their very names were talismans, and they rose before us under a halo of brilliant lights like figures in a shrine. It was<\/i> a kind of shrine: the grand oaken hall, the distant stage and its hallowed lectern, the enchanted voices with their variegated intonations, the rapt listeners scarcely breathing, the storied walls themselves in trance\u2014this was the Poetry Center of the 92nd Street Y in the heart of the twentieth century. <\/p>\n
![\"W. H.](\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Auden-11-6-1966-e1389893506460.jpg\")
<\/a>