{"id":157438,"date":"2022-03-08T11:08:20","date_gmt":"2022-03-08T16:08:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?p=157438"},"modified":"2022-03-08T11:09:01","modified_gmt":"2022-03-08T16:09:01","slug":"re-covered-edith-templeton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/","title":{"rendered":"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/columns\/re-covered\/\">Re-Covered<\/a>, Lucy Scholes exhumes the out-of-print and forgotten books that shouldn\u2019t be.<\/em><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_157416\" style=\"width: 1034px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-e1646677507870.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-157416\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-157442 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-1024x768.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"768\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-157416\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photograph by Lucy Scholes.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>\u201cYou are so exquisitely made,\u201d the American Major in Edith Templeton\u2019s 1968 short story \u201cThe Darts of Cupid\u201d tells the object of his desire, \u201cI could break every bone in your body.\u201d This predation is unsettling, as is the completeness with which Eve, the young woman who\u2019s being seduced, embraces the role of submissive victim. Entwined in her new lover\u2019s arms, she\u2019s reminded of a Japanese print she once saw, in which a naked female corpse, floating in the sea, is penetrated by the many tentacles of a large octopus. Her physical and emotional surrender is similarly all-encompassing: \u201cI knew that this was the rendering of love as it should be: trapped inescapably, secure and fastened, drowned in bed and water, both cradle and grave.\u201d<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Such sexually explicit content became what Templeton was best known for during her lifetime\u2014a reputation made yet more notorious due to the fact that she drew direct inspiration from her own illicit trysts. She was born into a wealthy upper-class family in Prague in 1916, and raised in a world of sophistication, civility, and gentility: this social milieu would have been shocked by such self-exposing erotica. Edith Passerov\u00e1, as she was then, met her first husband, the Englishman William Stockwell Templeton, when she was only seventeen. They married five years later, in 1938, and lived in England. The union quickly disintegrated, but rather than return home to what by that point was a war-torn Europe, Templeton remained in Britain after their separation. She initially took a job with the American War Office, during which time she had the brief fling described in \u201cThe Darts of Cupid.\u201d The story\u2019s candid, violently charged eroticism caused a stir when it was first published in <em>The<\/em> <em>New Yorker<\/em>, but even its level of graphic sexual detail paled in comparison to that of Templeton\u2019s most famous novel.<\/p>\n<p><em>Gordon, <\/em>which was originally published\u2014though not under her own name\u2014two years earlier, in 1966, is set in London shortly after the end of the Second World War, and fictionalizes Templeton\u2019s own fleeting but seminal sadomasochistic affair with a Scottish psychiatrist twenty years her senior in the mid-forties. Less than an hour after they first meet, in a pub in Mayfair, the eponymous Gordon has Louisa (Templeton\u2019s fictional alter-ego) flat on her back on a stone bench in a nearby public garden. \u201cThe whole was achieved in a matter of about four seconds,\u201d she reports incredulously. \u201cIt was speedy and casual and effortless and at the same time seemingly impossible, like a virtuoso performance.\u201d After a nine-month dalliance\u2014during which time Gordon regularly pressures Louisa into intercourse, often in public places and often employing excessive force in the process; refuses to kiss her or engage in any tenderness; and commands she \u201cmake loo loo\u201d for him on demand\u2014he abruptly ends the liaison, shortly after which he takes his own life.<\/p>\n<p>Although the sexual politics of the novel are decidedly disturbing\u2014\u201cNobody could have called it a rape,\u201d Louisa says rather unconvincingly of her and Gordon\u2019s dramatic first encounter; \u201cI was neither willing or unwilling. I was nothing at all. I had not been given the choice to be either\u201d\u2014it\u2019s the novel\u2019s treatment of psychoanalysis that dates it most. When he\u2019s not forcing himself on her body, Gordon\u2019s trying to wheedle his way into Louisa\u2019s unconscious by conducting an unethical bedside analysis, through which we learn that an early separation from her father (which mirrors Templeton\u2019s own) has left Louisa with certain daddy issues. \u201cYou are right,\u201d she tells her paramour towards the end of the novel; \u201cit\u2019s never occurred to me before. But it\u2019s true. You are\u2014you were\u2014like a father to me.\u201d While it\u2019s plausible that <em>Gordon<\/em>\u2019s first readers might have found these revelations surprising, today, it\u2019s all somewhat clich\u00e9d.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking in 2002, more than half a century after the real-life Gordon\u2019s suicide, Templeton still described their relationship as the &#8220;fundamental event\u201d of her life. It is apt, then, that its fictionalized version has made the most lasting mark on her literary reputation. It\u2019s the only one of her six novels still in print today (along with the short-story collection\u00a0<em>The Darts of Cupid<\/em>, which was published in 2002 and a finalist for that year\u2019s National Book Critics Circle award). This distinction is due, no doubt, to the scandal caused by the book\u2019s initial publication, at which time its sexual explicitness, especially for a woman writer, was radical: \u201cThe original <em>Fifty Shades of Grey<\/em>,\u201d reads the tagline on Penguin\u2019s website. But although <em>Gordon <\/em>is a literary landmark of sorts, it is not Templeton\u2019s finest work. In fact, it\u2019s her first three novels that are her best: <em>Summer in the Country <\/em>(1950) (which was released in the U.S. under the alternative title\u00a0<em>The Proper Bohemians<\/em>\u00a0in 1952), <em>Living on Yesterday <\/em>(1951), and <em>The Island of Desire <\/em>(1952). What is explicit in <em>Gordon <\/em>is implicit in these novels. Although not officially a trilogy, they are best understood as a triumvirate of sorts: a detailed panorama of the upper classes of Central Europe between the wars, a society that gives the outward appearance of being refined, urbane, and elegant but has danger and disorder simmering beneath the surface.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***<\/p>\n<p>Set in the sprawling castles that dot the Bohemian countryside and the large town houses of Prague\u2019s most sought-after residential streets, Templeton\u2019s little-known early novels depict a world of intricate, cryptic social codes\u2014a language that is imprinted on those who belong but impossible to translate for those who don\u2019t. Regularly dining out in restaurants is looked down upon (doing so implies deficiency in one\u2019s own chef); ladies must employ a favored dressmaker (though it would be vulgar to wear actual couture); and the man who wears his slippers outside of the privacy of his own bedroom can never be a true gentleman. In a life so meticulously choreographed, the slightest faux pas is a red flag, a permanent sign of bad character. The inverse is true as well: a well-executed performance is interchangeable with an authentic one. \u201cHe looks like a man,\u201d declares one character of another in <em>Living on Yesterday<\/em>. \u201cAnd because he looks like one he thinks he is one.\u201d (The real question, of course, is whether other people\u2014the people who count\u2014think he is, too.) In a society in which impressions are critical, nothing is ever quite as it seems; in Templeton\u2019s novels, a polished exterior inevitably obscures a grubbier truth. These are ostensibly novels of manners, but as the English novelist Anita Brookner so astutely observes, \u201cthey are also something more, for running beneath the social comedy, so beautifully conducted by all the principal players, there lie acts of madness, of revenge, and of revolt.\u201d Yet through it all, good etiquette prevails; neither comedy nor tragedy shakes the composure of Templeton\u2019s characters\u2014nor the controlled elegance of her own prose.<\/p>\n<p>In Templeton\u2019s first three novels, it is often the matriarchal figures who are the arbiters of social mores: worldly, inflexible women who see everything\u2014or, at least, everything they want to see\u2014yet give little away themselves. <em>The Island of Desire<\/em> features the especially self-composed Mrs. Kalny; ever perfectly coiffed and smooth of brow, she remains \u201coutwardly calm\u201d even as great currents of frustration (caused by the behavior of her tiresome teenage daughter, Franciska) roil within her. Here is restraint, Templeton writes, \u201cno less ascetic than the discipline of the soldier or the nun.\u201d In <em>Summer in the Country<\/em>, it is a Mrs. Birk who presides over the family castle. Too polite to explicitly articulate her dislike of her daughter, Alice, Mrs. Birk nevertheless makes a point of evidencing her disdain in a more artful fashion. \u201cWould you like some of this sherry, Mr Marek?\u201d she asks one guest. \u201cThere is whiskey and gin, if you prefer it, but you\u2019ll have to wait till my daughter Alice comes. She keeps it locked up. It gives her something to do.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It is Alice\u2019s daughter\u2019s husband, the nouveau riche Oscar Ritter, who makes the mistake of leaving his bedroom at Castle Kirna without first changing out of his slippers. Although the Birk family disdains their in-law for his poor manners, it is his money that maintains their ancestral home and estate. Much of the equilibrium of Templeton\u2019s world is sustained by similarly Faustian pacts. In <em>Living on Yesterday<\/em>, another matriarch, a Baroness Kreslov\u2014the wife of a prosperous industrialist, and the intimidating society hostess of the most famed soirees in all of Prague\u2014marries her daughter, Hedwig, to the young and handsome Count Szalay, a man whose lack of fortune is made up for by his impeccable breeding. Hedwig will provide the capital; he will provide the class. When, after the marriage, it is revealed that Szalay is not the nobleman he claims to be, the baroness remains unruffled\u2014all she requires is that he sustain the masquerade.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***<\/p>\n<p>Of these three novels,<em> The Island of Desire<\/em> showcases the most stinging examples of the same ruthless sangfroid that\u2019s so valued in the social world of Templeton\u2019s writing. It\u2019s impossible to tell, we\u2019re told, how much Mr. Kalny knows about his wife\u2019s habitual, though discreet, infidelities, \u201cbut it [is] certainly due to his sobriety and good sense\u2014the good sense of the mediocre\u2014that nothing scandalous ever transpired and that Mrs. Kalny had acquired the reputation of an <em>allumeuse<\/em>, which was flattering, instead of that of a society whore, which was not.\u201d Templeton grasps the ferocity of her milieu, yet there\u2019s nothing crude about the way she renders it on the page. As the <em>Times Literary Supplement<\/em>\u2019s review pointed out, \u201cThis is a most savage book, but it is subtle too.\u201d Templeton spares neither husband nor wife in the episode above; never has the term <em>mediocre<\/em> been quite so cutting.<\/p>\n<p>Templeton\u2019s world is particularly cruel to young women, for whom innocence and purity, though valued above all else, often become hazards that leave them especially vulnerable. When Franciska Kalny seeks to extricate herself from the clutches of her selfish, pampered other, she does so by rashly marrying a young Englishman whom she takes, based on the most cursory of observations, to be a suitable match. Mr. Parker is modeled on the real-life Mr. Templeton, whom the author married in a similarly naive state, and who, like his fictionalized avatar, would quickly disabuse his young wife of her illusions. For, sadly, Franciska \u201chad not a sufficient knowledge of people in general to discern certain traits which are common to those of gentle birth in all countries,\u201d and Mr. Parker soon reveals himself not to be the gentleman she thought he was, and perhaps not quite the husband either: it is delicately implied that he harbors homosexual desires.<\/p>\n<p>All of Templeton\u2019s novels are about power play, even as the settings change from the salons and drawing rooms of Prague to the bedrooms and backstreets of London. The brutality that bubbles beneath the surface in her early work is given merely a plainly sexual form in <em>Gordon <\/em>and \u201cThe Darts of Cupid,&#8221; though the subtlety of her prose, and therefore the mastery of her menace, is blunted in the process. But even in the first three novels, sex itself plays a\u2014perhaps surprisingly\u2014significant role for her characters. \u201cAren\u2019t you sorry, Mama, after all that you did not marry Feldman?\u201d asks Franciska, referring to a rather unattractive but \u201cterribly rich\u201d family friend. \u201cEvery day I am sorry. Every night I am glad,\u201d is her worldly mother\u2019s witty, and no doubt sincere, reply.<\/p>\n<p>Templeton recognizes what is traded between people, and is unafraid to name it; for her, intimacy is a process of commercial exchange. \u201cI have always prostituted myself,\u201d she said in an interview in the early 2000s. \u201cDo not misunderstand, I do not mean I went out into the street,\u201d she clarifies. \u201cI had no money, I had to live, so I married and I was kept by various men \u2026 I want to be a parasite, I need to be kept, so I can write.\u201d Her commitment to her craft is as striking as her misogyny: in the same conversation, she dismisses feminism as \u201cidiotic\u201d; men, she declares, \u201care superior,\u201d and that\u2019s that. In another interview, she confesses that she never loved her only son. Though chilling, Templeton\u2019s ruthlessness is channeled into rich form in her fiction. If her relationship with the real-life Gordon was the defining event in her life, the more ambient machinations of the society in which she moved had just as much of an influence on her, both as a writer and as a woman. In these novels\u2014as in life, Templeton would no doubt have argued\u2014virtue, decency, and kindness are not rewarded, and naivete and youth put one only at a disadvantage. \u201cIf you\u2019re going to be a writer, you have to be willing to be nasty,\u201d she is recorded as saying, shortly before she died in 2006, at age ninety at her home in Bordighera on the Italian Riviera. \u201cThe idyllic does not work\u2014maybe it does in painting, but not in literature.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>Lucy Scholes is a critic who lives in London. She writes for the\u00a0<\/em>NYR Daily<em>,<\/em>\u00a0<em>the<\/em>\u00a0Financial Times<em>,<\/em>\u00a0The New York Times Book Review<em>,\u00a0and\u00a0<\/em>Literary Hub<em>, among other publications. Read earlier installments of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/columns\/re-covered\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Re-Covered<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe idyllic does not work\u2014maybe it does in painting, but not in literature.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1670,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[46439],"tags":[4846,68374,31210,20545,3665,23938],"class_list":["post-157438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-re-covered","tag-britain","tag-edith-templeton","tag-lucy-scholes","tag-out-of-print","tag-prague","tag-sexual"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.4 (Yoast SEO v25.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Re-Covered: Edith Templeton by Lucy Scholes<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"March 8, 2022 \u2013 \u201cThe idyllic does not work\u2014maybe it does in painting, but not in literature.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton by Lucy Scholes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"March 8, 2022 \u2013 \u201cThe idyllic does not work\u2014maybe it does in painting, but not in literature.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Paris Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-08T16:08:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-03-08T16:09:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-e1646677507870.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"750\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Lucy Scholes\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@parisreview\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@parisreview\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Lucy Scholes\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Lucy Scholes\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f7d002776d4d7c0fdb6961eddb06dabc\"},\"headline\":\"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-08T16:08:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-08T16:09:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/\"},\"wordCount\":2285,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-1024x768.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Britain\",\"Edith templeton\",\"Lucy Scholes\",\"Out of Print\",\"Prague\",\"sexual\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Re-Covered\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/\",\"name\":\"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton by Lucy Scholes\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-1024x768.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-08T16:08:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-08T16:09:01+00:00\",\"description\":\"March 8, 2022 \u2013 \u201cThe idyllic does not work\u2014maybe it does in painting, but not in literature.\u201d\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-e1646677507870.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-e1646677507870.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":750},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"The Paris Review\",\"description\":\"The best prose, interviews, poetry, and art. Since 1953.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Paris Review\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png\",\"width\":696,\"height\":696,\"caption\":\"The Paris Review\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/parisreview\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/parisreview\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f7d002776d4d7c0fdb6961eddb06dabc\",\"name\":\"Lucy Scholes\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8fcb3b549485201ecf60f90fa5811784c042b8229af2de0c3d0ae1842eac9eff?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8fcb3b549485201ecf60f90fa5811784c042b8229af2de0c3d0ae1842eac9eff?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Lucy Scholes\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/author\/lscholes\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton by Lucy Scholes","description":"March 8, 2022 \u2013 \u201cThe idyllic does not work\u2014maybe it does in painting, but not in literature.\u201d","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton by Lucy Scholes","og_description":"March 8, 2022 \u2013 \u201cThe idyllic does not work\u2014maybe it does in painting, but not in literature.\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/","og_site_name":"The Paris Review","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/","article_published_time":"2022-03-08T16:08:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-03-08T16:09:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":750,"url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-e1646677507870.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Lucy Scholes","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@parisreview","twitter_site":"@parisreview","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Lucy Scholes","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/"},"author":{"name":"Lucy Scholes","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f7d002776d4d7c0fdb6961eddb06dabc"},"headline":"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton","datePublished":"2022-03-08T16:08:20+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-08T16:09:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/"},"wordCount":2285,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-1024x768.jpg","keywords":["Britain","Edith templeton","Lucy Scholes","Out of Print","Prague","sexual"],"articleSection":["Re-Covered"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/","name":"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton by Lucy Scholes","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-1024x768.jpg","datePublished":"2022-03-08T16:08:20+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-08T16:09:01+00:00","description":"March 8, 2022 \u2013 \u201cThe idyllic does not work\u2014maybe it does in painting, but not in literature.\u201d","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-e1646677507870.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/img_5018-e1646677507870.jpg","width":1000,"height":750},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2022\/03\/08\/re-covered-edith-templeton\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Re-Covered: Edith Templeton"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/","name":"The Paris Review","description":"The best prose, interviews, poetry, and art. Since 1953.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization","name":"The Paris Review","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png","width":696,"height":696,"caption":"The Paris Review"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/","https:\/\/x.com\/parisreview","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/parisreview"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f7d002776d4d7c0fdb6961eddb06dabc","name":"Lucy Scholes","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8fcb3b549485201ecf60f90fa5811784c042b8229af2de0c3d0ae1842eac9eff?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8fcb3b549485201ecf60f90fa5811784c042b8229af2de0c3d0ae1842eac9eff?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Lucy Scholes"},"url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/author\/lscholes\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1670"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157438"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157438\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":157471,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157438\/revisions\/157471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}