{"id":125900,"date":"2018-05-30T09:00:55","date_gmt":"2018-05-30T13:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?p=125900"},"modified":"2018-05-29T16:37:13","modified_gmt":"2018-05-29T20:37:13","slug":"how-much-should-the-met-cost-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/","title":{"rendered":"How Much Should the Met Cost You?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It will soon be three months since the Metropolitan Museum of Art instituted its new admissions policy: pay what you wish for New Yorkers and tristate students, a discount for the elderly and groups, and twenty-five dollars for everybody else. From 1970 to 2018, the Met\u2019s policy had been a more beneficent one\u2014admission fees were up to the discretion of each guest, and the museum was, as Alexandra Schwartz recently wrote for The New Yorker<\/em>, \u201cas open to the public as Central Park.\u201d<\/p>\n

When the Met announced the new fee, commentators envisioned an apocalypse on Fifth Avenue\u2014\u201cThe Met Should Be Open to All. The New Pay Policy Is a Mistake<\/u><\/a>,<\/u>\u201d \u201cThe Metropolitan Museum\u2019s New Admission Policy Sticks It to Tourists<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0In its press release, the Met made clear that it \u201cwill accept a variety of other documents that demonstrate New York residency,\u201d and suggested that virtually no underprivileged guests have actually been turned away. However, this change affects more than just access to the Temple of Dendur. The Metropolitan Museum of Art is arguably the world\u2019s most influential museum, with many ambitions besides serving its visitors. It maintains one of the best conservation labs in the world, sponsors architectural excavations, and funds the research of expert scholars. These are all valuable endeavors, yet the Met\u2019s decision to curtail pay-what-you-wish signals to museums everywhere that when the budget demands, the public should take a backseat to other priorities and stakeholders. Since its inception, the Met has grappled with how to fulfill its civic and educational missions while catering to wealthy donors and preserving the world\u2019s treasures, many of them ill-gotten. Facing a budgetary crisis of its own making, the museum\u2019s decision to scrap its most symbolically open-hearted policy once again brings that conflict out of storage and into the light.<\/p>\n

The Met\u2019s communications office explains their predicament this way: Unlike other New York art and history museums, the Met is a public\/private partnership, built on land owned by the city and funded in part by New York taxpayers. This means the museum is compelled to offer discounts to residents. In recent years, however, the Met has come under budgetary pressure, with a shrinking allowance from the mayor\u2019s office (down to just 12 percent of its annual budget in 2017), which barely pays for the building\u2019s utilities. At the same time, the number of visitors has almost doubled in the past decade, while the rate of individual membership and full-price ticket sales has plummeted. To add an extra ten million dollars in annual revenue, the museum decided to start charging full admission to out-of-towners, who represent 31 percent of the Met\u2019s seven million annual visitors. As a consolation, the new ticket also grants admission to the Met\u2019s other institutions, the Cloisters and the Met Breuer. \u201cExcellence costs money,\u201d says Daniel Weiss, the Met\u2019s president and CEO, and given how much tourists spend on other amenities and entertainment experiences in New York, the assumption is that they can afford the new fee.<\/p>\n

The Met is quick to point out that its competitors are not shackled in the same way. Either they subsist on state funding and are totally free\u2014like the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C., or the Tate in London\u2014or they charge a king\u2019s ransom to see the work on their walls, like the Louvre (seventeen euros) or the Uffizi (twenty Euro). And New York\u2019s private museums are comparably expensive: MoMA, the Whitney, and the Guggenheim each charge twenty-five dollars for full-priced admission. Many of these places have free days or evenings; however, research by the museum engagement analyst Colleen Dilenschneider suggests<\/a> that these strategies don\u2019t actually attract underserved visitors but just bring in people who have already been to the museum before, and who are richer and whiter than average museum attendees.<\/p>\n

The history of the Met\u2019s admissions policies is full of eerily similar conflicts to the ones playing out today. As Sven Beckert points out in the The Monied Metropolis<\/em>, when the Metropolitan Museum of Art opened its doors in 1880, it was largely the domain of New York\u2019s rapidly evolving bourgeoisie. The founders were a combination of the city\u2019s mercantile old guard, like William H. Astor, and newcomers who\u2019d made their money in finance and industry, like J. P. Morgan and Cornelius Vanderbilt. They wanted to create an arts institution that would gather their impressive personal collections and rival the museums of Europe. Though the Met was conceived as public, board members often referred to it as \u201cour museum\u201d in correspondence. Though the Met offered free admission on certain weekdays, it was, until 1891, closed on Sundays, the one day a week when working people had the leisure time to spend there.<\/p>\n

Only a few years into its operation, the Met faced pushback against its perceived elitism and inaccessibility. In February of 1897, a plumber working in one of the grand mansions on Fifth Avenue decided to look at some art during his lunch hour and was turned away by museum staff for wearing dirty overalls. Local newspapers launched a cavalcade of attacks.<\/p>\n

SOBER WORKMAN HAS TO LEAVE ART GALLERIES
\nART FOR THE WELL DRESSED
\nSENSITIVE AND REFINED PLUMBER AFFRONTED<\/small><\/p>\n

The museum\u2019s director, Luigi Palma di Cesnola, responded with a public statement defending the Met\u2019s refusal to allow the plumber inside, exacerbating the public relations crisis even further. \u201cWe do not want, nor will we permit a person who has been digging in a filthy sewer or working among grease and oil to come in here, and by offensive odors emitted from the dirt on on their apparel, make the surroundings uncomfortable for others,\u201d Cesnola told a room full of journalists. Papers like the Brooklyn Daily Eagle<\/em> and the New York Sun<\/em> ran follow-ups and op-eds for a month afterward, debating exactly who was fit to enter the Metropolitan\u2019s hallowed halls and how exactly the institution could claim to exist for the purpose \u201cof furnishing popular instruction\u201d when it seemed intent on keeping the people out.<\/p>\n

In the following decades, the Met added free days and experimented with charging for special exhibitions. From 1941 to 1970, it went completely free, relying on the largesse of its endowment. The trouble with this policy was that benefactors preferred to bequeath collections or pay for new construction (where their legacies would be more visibly preserved) rather than donate to a general fund. This issue persists today. In 2016, the Met received a gift of eighty million dollars from the trustee Florence Irving, earmarked for the acquisition of Asian art; and in 2013, it received sixty-five million dollars from David Koch for the lavish Fifth Avenue facade and plaza renovation. Were such gifts diverted to operating expenses, the museum would likely never have had to charge admission.<\/p>\n

Of course, the barriers to entry in cultural institutions have always been about more than just the price of a ticket. Though the midcentury saw the Met become more economically accessible, the museum still took active measures to exclude undesirable guests, especially nonwhite ones. In a letter to the art historian Susan E. Cahan, published in Mounting Frustration: The Art Museum in the Age of Black Power<\/em>, the former Met director Thomas Hoving recalls \u201cIrish guards at the main entrance actually turned away African Americans and Hispanics, saying the MMA was a private club.\u201d<\/p>\n

In 1969, the Met faced one of its largest public protests surrounding the exhibition titled \u201cHarlem on My Mind,\u201d which curators had hoped would speak to a more diverse audience. The show drew ire for taking an ethnographic approach to representing Harlem by using photographs and mass media, while omitting sculpture and painting. As Aruna D\u2019Souza writes in Whitewalling: Art, Race, and Protest in Three Acts<\/em>, \u201cIn the first-ever exhibition of African American culture at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, no black art was to be included<\/em>.\u201d In the lead-up to the show, the Met had consulted many influential figures in the black community, such as Ed Taylor of the Harlem Cultural Council and the scholar and activist John Henrik Clarke, but largely ignored their advice. Though people of color were theoretically welcome to visit the museum, they had no say in shaping its curatorial priorities. HARLEM ON WHOSE MIND?<\/small> one protester\u2019s sign read.<\/p>\n

The pressure from protesters and the mayor\u2019s office caused the Met to make some major changes, including loaning out portions of its collection to underserved communities around New York City and helping to found arts institutions in the outer boroughs, such as Snug Harbor in Staten Island, and the Queens Museum. During this same period, the Met was also facing financial troubles. Shortly after the \u201cHarlem on My Mind\u201d disaster, the wealthy financier and museum trustee Henry Ittleson Jr. proposed a pay-what-you-wish admission fee in an effort to make up an annual deficit while still remaining accessible to underserved populations of visitors. The Met\u2019s 1970 press release announcing the change described it as a \u201cperson by person fund-raising program,\u201d which they hoped would become \u201ca hotly defended institution on its own in a town where you usually hear \u2018pay up, pay plenty, and the public be damned.\u2019 \u201d<\/p>\n

To fix what many regard as the Met\u2019s recent calamitous decision to abandon pay-what-you-wish, one group of artists, called Equitable Met<\/a>, is proposing that the museum reinstate it with an interesting twist. Instead of framing admission as something guests choose to pay based on how much they value their experience, Equitable Met believes visitors should be asked to pay on a sliding scale according to their income\u2014something like, \u201cFrom each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.\u201d It\u2019s not about how much guests wish to pay, but how much they can actually afford. As the cocreator Kevin Wiesner explained, \u201cFor sliding scale to be sustainable, it needs to not feel like charity\u201d but instead to feel like a civic obligation. The group estimates that a scale sliding from zero to thirty-five dollars, with prices clearly indexed to self-declared income, would actually generate more revenue\u2014despite moochers\u2014than the current, mandatory-fee structure.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

The proposed fee structure from Equitable Met.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

In a sense, the Met\u2019s members and full-paying guests had already been using a sort of sliding scale. It used to be that if you were a New Yorker of a certain class, your family had a membership at the Met, Lincoln Center, and one or two other cultural institutions in the city. But as middle-class income and interest in the fine arts dwindled, expectations to maintain such memberships eroded, and a growing number of other cultural institutions are competing for that shrinking pool of donors<\/a>. And that\u2019s if you can get donors off their couches and phones\u2014a 2017 study from Culture Track<\/a> found that museums are losing eyeballs to the growing variety of digital distractions. The result of these changing economic, technological, and cultural forces is that museums like the Met can no longer rely on unspoken social pressures to secure revenue. Equitable Met argues that the museum must make the financial position of its guests more explicit in order to more fairly serve them all. \u201cWe really want people to consider how they fit into the larger economic picture,\u201d says the cocreator Lukas Bentel.<\/p>\n

The Met has historically catered to its wealthier visitors through its collection priorities, programming, and even through its physical location on the Upper East Side\u2014but through its new Multicultural Audience Development Initiative<\/a> and successful social-media campaigns, the museum has made<\/a> strides <\/a>toward bringing underserved visitors through its doors and engaging them as stakeholders in the institution. Such progress may well be reversed in the coming months and years. Even with its many exceptions and carve outs, Josephine Devanbu, cocreator of Equitable Met and Look at Art Get Paid<\/a> thinks the Met\u2019s new policy will keep some visitors away. A working-class family from Newark, a recent college grad waitressing at night and sleeping on a friend\u2019s couch, an undocumented immigrant afraid the museum will ask for his papers. Without public opposition to hold them accountable, Devanbu suspects other cultural institutions will make similar about-faces in their inclusion efforts. \u201cThere\u2019s a long history of the museum making concessions,\u201d she says, \u201cand having that fade away in the decades where there isn\u2019t as much pressure.\u201d<\/p>\n

If the history of the Met is any guide, there have always been scandals and debates over whom the institution actually serves, but the museum rarely addresses those concerns unless its hand is forced. As the memory of pay-what-you-wish fades and the new policy solidifies into \u201cthe way things are done,\u201d the chances of mustering the necessary pressure will likely fade as well. Other museums facing similar financial ultimatums, such as SFMoMA<\/a> and the Indianapolis Museum of Art<\/a>, are already following the Met\u2019s lead, either by switching from free to paid admission or raising ticket prices to pay for new construction. Museum administrators will contend that nobody is being excluded by these changes, but it\u2019s nearly impossible to measure the continued absence of marginalized visitors, who remain outside the museum\u2019s reach and who never attended in the first place. Since its opening, the Metropolitan Museum of Art has been likened to a high temple of art, a bustling civic forum, and an imperious fortress perched on the edge of Central Park. In its 148 years, the institution has vacillated between all three. Only now, its drawbridges seem to be rising over those moatlike fountains, and the public has been left on the other side.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Daniel Penny<\/a>\u00a0writes\u00a0about art and culture at\u00a0<\/em>The New Yorker,<\/em> Boston Review, and elsewhere. He teaches writing and visual culture at Parsons School of Design.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  It will soon be three months since the Metropolitan Museum of Art instituted its new admissions policy: pay what you wish for New Yorkers and tristate students, a discount for the elderly and groups, and twenty-five dollars for everybody else. From 1970 to 2018, the Met\u2019s policy had been a more beneficent one\u2014admission fees […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1369,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[419],"tags":[34243,34245,34239,34237,34238,34246,34241,34240,17303,28650,34244,34236,17121,3436,34242],"class_list":["post-125900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arts-culture","tag-and-protest-in-three-acts","tag-aruna-dsouza","tag-culture-track","tag-equitable-met","tag-look-at-art-get-paid","tag-luigi-palma-di-cesnola","tag-mounting-frustration-the-art-museum-in-the-age-of-black-power","tag-multicultural-audience-development-initiative","tag-race","tag-sfmoma","tag-susan-e-cahan","tag-the-indianapolis-museum-of-art","tag-thomas-hoving","tag-upper-east-side","tag-whitewalling-art"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nHow Much Should The Met Cost You?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"One group of artists, called Equitable Met, is asking that the museum reinstate its pay-what-you-wish donation with an interesting twist.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How Much Should the Met Cost You? by Daniel Penny\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"May 30, 2018 \u2013   It will soon be three months since the Metropolitan Museum of Art instituted its new admissions policy: pay what you wish for New Yorkers and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Paris Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-30T13:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1025\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"827\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daniel Penny\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@parisreview\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@parisreview\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daniel Penny\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Daniel Penny\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a4f7f6ffc008302a46021c6438548cf7\"},\"headline\":\"How Much Should the Met Cost You?\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-30T13:00:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/\"},\"wordCount\":2314,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art-1024x826.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"and Protest in Three Acts\",\"Aruna D\u2019Souza\",\"Culture Track\",\"Equitable Met\",\"Look at Art Get Paid\",\"Luigi Palma di Cesnola\",\"Mounting Frustration: The Art Museum in the Age of Black Power\",\"Multicultural Audience Development Initiative\",\"race\",\"SFMoMA\",\"Susan E. Cahan\",\"The Indianapolis Museum of Art\",\"Thomas Hoving\",\"Upper East Side\",\"Whitewalling: Art\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Arts & Culture\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/\",\"name\":\"How Much Should The Met Cost You?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art-1024x826.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-30T13:00:55+00:00\",\"description\":\"One group of artists, called Equitable Met, is asking that the museum reinstate its pay-what-you-wish donation with an interesting twist.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art.jpg\",\"width\":1025,\"height\":827},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How Much Should the Met Cost You?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"The Paris Review\",\"description\":\"The best prose, interviews, poetry, and art. Since 1953.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Paris Review\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png\",\"width\":696,\"height\":696,\"caption\":\"The Paris Review\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/parisreview\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/parisreview\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a4f7f6ffc008302a46021c6438548cf7\",\"name\":\"Daniel Penny\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7412c23a86d8c45ec37b6d44ec120aba91a5c07b3211ab5cca3c45930fae55?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7412c23a86d8c45ec37b6d44ec120aba91a5c07b3211ab5cca3c45930fae55?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Daniel Penny\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/author\/dpenny\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How Much Should The Met Cost You?","description":"One group of artists, called Equitable Met, is asking that the museum reinstate its pay-what-you-wish donation with an interesting twist.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How Much Should the Met Cost You? by Daniel Penny","og_description":"May 30, 2018 \u2013   It will soon be three months since the Metropolitan Museum of Art instituted its new admissions policy: pay what you wish for New Yorkers and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/","og_site_name":"The Paris Review","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-30T13:00:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1025,"height":827,"url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Daniel Penny","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@parisreview","twitter_site":"@parisreview","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Daniel Penny","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/"},"author":{"name":"Daniel Penny","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a4f7f6ffc008302a46021c6438548cf7"},"headline":"How Much Should the Met Cost You?","datePublished":"2018-05-30T13:00:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/"},"wordCount":2314,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art-1024x826.jpg","keywords":["and Protest in Three Acts","Aruna D\u2019Souza","Culture Track","Equitable Met","Look at Art Get Paid","Luigi Palma di Cesnola","Mounting Frustration: The Art Museum in the Age of Black Power","Multicultural Audience Development Initiative","race","SFMoMA","Susan E. Cahan","The Indianapolis Museum of Art","Thomas Hoving","Upper East Side","Whitewalling: Art"],"articleSection":["Arts & Culture"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/","name":"How Much Should The Met Cost You?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art-1024x826.jpg","datePublished":"2018-05-30T13:00:55+00:00","description":"One group of artists, called Equitable Met, is asking that the museum reinstate its pay-what-you-wish donation with an interesting twist.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/1025px-the_metropolitan_museum_of_art.jpg","width":1025,"height":827},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/how-much-should-the-met-cost-you\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How Much Should the Met Cost You?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/","name":"The Paris Review","description":"The best prose, interviews, poetry, and art. Since 1953.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization","name":"The Paris Review","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png","width":696,"height":696,"caption":"The Paris Review"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/","https:\/\/x.com\/parisreview","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/parisreview"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a4f7f6ffc008302a46021c6438548cf7","name":"Daniel Penny","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7412c23a86d8c45ec37b6d44ec120aba91a5c07b3211ab5cca3c45930fae55?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7412c23a86d8c45ec37b6d44ec120aba91a5c07b3211ab5cca3c45930fae55?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Daniel Penny"},"url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/author\/dpenny\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1369"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125900"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125900\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":125983,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125900\/revisions\/125983"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}