{"id":109562,"date":"2017-04-04T17:27:07","date_gmt":"2017-04-04T21:27:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?p=109562"},"modified":"2017-04-04T17:50:25","modified_gmt":"2017-04-04T21:50:25","slug":"ruins-made-in-advance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/","title":{"rendered":"Ruins in Advance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/category\/revisited\/\" target=\"_blank\">Revisited<\/a> is a series in which writers look back on a work of art they first encountered long ago. Here, Kyle Chayka\u00a0revisits Anselm Kiefer\u2019s <\/em>Velimir Chlebnikov<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_109563\" style=\"width: 1247px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-109563\" class=\"wp-image-109563 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg\" width=\"1237\" height=\"550\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg 1237w, https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3-300x133.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3-768x341.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3-1024x455.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (min-width: 62.5em) 67vw, 100vw\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-109563\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Anselm Kiefer, <i>Velimir Chlebnikov<\/i>, 2004 (detail), thirty paintings: oil, emulsion, acrylic, lead, and mixed media on canvas; eighteen paintings: 75&#8243; x 130&#8243; each; twelve paintings: 75&#8243; x 110&#8243; each. Photo: Arthur Evans, courtesy Hall Art Foundation, \u00a9 Anselm Kiefer<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The summer before I went to college, in 2006, I worked as a guard at the <a href=\"http:\/\/aldrichart.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Aldrich Museum<\/a>, a contemporary-art museum an hour from where I grew up in the Connecticut woods. It\u2019s the best job I\u2019ve ever had, and I\u2019m fairly certain it always will be. For ten dollars an hour\u2014a royal sum for a teenager whose only other gig had been making cider donuts at an apple orchard\u2014I and five or six other guards, some retirees and others fellow students, stationed ourselves in the airy galleries to make sure none of the guests touched or collided with the art on display. Mainly, our responsibility was to have conversations with visitors reassuring them of the validity of the curatorial decisions:\u00a0<em>Yes, this is art<\/em>. When there was no one around to question contemporary aesthetics, we sat on foldout stools and read, drew, or knitted. (In this way, I made my way through most of Haruki Murakami\u2019s oeuvre.)<\/p>\n<p>That summer, one of the galleries on rotation\u2014we switched locations on the hour, so over the course of a day every guard got a full tour\u2014was a two-story-tall corrugated-steel pavilion built on a cement plinth outside on the museum\u2019s grounds. The pavilion was a <a href=\"http:\/\/images.hallartfoundation.org\/www_hallartfoundation_org\/Keifer_Aldrich_Previews_P7J22550.jpg\">work by the German artist Anselm Kiefer<\/a>, a painter and sculptor known for the gnarled surface of his huge canvases as well as for his gothic sensibility: an atmosphere of fallen historical grandeur pervades his work. Inside the rectangular pavilion\u2019s towering metal doors, the two side walls were hung with thirty paintings arranged in grids, covering every inch.\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The paintings were oceanscapes, with cresting waves built from\u00a0pounds of caked oil paint in dark oranges and grays. Most of the canvases were affixed with oxidized-lead models of industrial ships or submarines, crumpled and beaten as if beached, somewhere between floating and sunk. It was impossible to gauge the size of the paintings. Stretching toward the ceiling, they loomed ominously, themselves about to crash.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cVelimir Chlebnikov\u201d was the name of the series, after the obscure early-twentieth-century Russian futurist poet and mystic. Chlebnikov theorized a cycle of history in which momentous sea battles occurred every 317 years, back to the Trojan War\u2014hence the ocean-faring vessels. Fitting such mythology, Kiefer\u2019s paintings were inscribed with names like <em>Leander<\/em>, <em>Hero<\/em>, and <em>Aphrodite<\/em>. On some canvases, a white glove made of metal hung above the surf, fingers pointed down: the hand of God, time, a ghost.<\/p>\n<p>In aggregate, I spent days of my life inside this installation, contemplating the paintings in awed silence. When guests walked in, I could often see this awe wash\u00a0across their faces, too. Witnessing these epiphanies, as visitors realized that contemporary art could be accessible and even deeply moving whether you think you know anything about art history or not, was one of the job\u2019s many perks. I was offered the guard position after participating in the museum\u2019s weekly after-school workshop for high school students, and I prided myself on some small degree of connoisseurship: the\u00a0ability to tell a Braques from a Beckmann and a working definition of <em>appropriation<\/em>. But what living with an artwork day in and day out teaches you is that you don\u2019t need any superficial information or instructional interpretation; certain pieces will affect you no matter what, sending a ripple streaming through the rest of your life.<\/p>\n<p>In the Kiefer pavilion, I inspected every detail of the cracked paint, gauging where its sense of timelessness came from. Were the paintings inside the isolated building ruins made in advance, relics from our inevitable decline? During storms, rain would beat an apocalyptic patter on the metal roof, making the painted oceans even more present. When the pavilion\u2019s chill became pervasive, I would step outside into the sunshine, back to a present in which bank trading in subprime mortgages was about to crash the economy\u2014not that anyone knew it at the time.<\/p>\n<p>Kiefer has followed me over the ensuing dozen years, or I found myself following him. You\u2019re likely to run into his work in major museum collections anywhere in the world. Around 2010, I encountered a particularly striking installation, <em>Etroits sont les Vaisseaux (Narrow Are the Vessels)<\/em>, at <a href=\"http:\/\/massmoca.org\/event\/anselm-kiefer\/\" target=\"_blank\">the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art<\/a>, where \u201cVelimir Chlebnikov\u201d is now permanently installed. (I highly recommend making the trip.) Composed of huge sections of undulating cement, rebar, and debris stretching eighty feet, the piece looks like a sidewalk in an earthquake. Scratched on a nearby wall in shaky handwriting is a line from the French poet Saint-John Perse, who wrote the verse referenced by the work\u2019s title: \u201cOne same wave throughout the world, one same wave since Troy \/ Rolls its haunch towards us.\u201d Through Kiefer\u2019s work, history becomes an inviolable force, invisible and yet omnipresent, a force to which we are all victim.<\/p>\n<p>In the past year, I\u2019ve often found myself thinking of sitting inside the metal pavilion, partly out of a desire to recapture the meditative quiet and relative simplicity of that point in my life, but also reflecting on the meaning of the Velimir Chlebnikov paintings as I, and they, age. I don\u2019t know that as a teenager I had yet felt the sensation of being carried away by the tide of history that the canvases portray, of the uncaring cycles of the planets and their endless numerical orbits, the futility of centuries of human conflict. But recalling the work is a reminder that now, I do.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/kchayka.tumblr.com\/clips\" target=\"_blank\">Kyle Chayka<\/a> is a writer living in Brooklyn. <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In \u201cRevisited,\u201d writers look back on a work of art they first encountered long ago. Here, Kyle Chayka revisits Anselm Kiefer\u2019s Velimir Chlebnikov.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1149,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22669],"tags":[4064,28210,20202,35,9241,21355,1861,28211,4097,1274,25928,4154,21226,26974,20904,28212,28209],"class_list":["post-109562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-revisited","tag-adolescence","tag-aldrich-museum","tag-anselm-kiefer","tag-art","tag-artists","tag-canvas","tag-contemporary-art","tag-etroits-sont-les-vaisseaux","tag-installation-art","tag-mass-moca","tag-oceans","tag-paintings","tag-revisited","tag-russian-futurism","tag-storms","tag-subprime-mortgage-crisis","tag-velimer-chlebnikov"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.4 (Yoast SEO v25.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Revisited: On Anselm Kiefer\u2019s \u201cVelimir Chlebnikov\u201d<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In \u201cRevisited,\u201d writers look back on a work of art they first encountered long ago. Here, Kyle Chayka revisits Anselm Kiefer\u2019s Velimir Chlebnikov.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ruins in Advance by Kyle Chayka\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"April 4, 2017 \u2013 In \u201cRevisited,\u201d writers look back on a work of art they first encountered long ago. Here, Kyle Chayka revisits Anselm Kiefer\u2019s Velimir Chlebnikov.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Paris Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-04T21:27:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-04T21:50:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1237\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"550\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kyle Chayka\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@parisreview\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@parisreview\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kyle Chayka\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kyle Chayka\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/6daf2f404382fc3cd6c8e84d813d2fc8\"},\"headline\":\"Ruins in Advance\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-04T21:27:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-04T21:50:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/\"},\"wordCount\":1001,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"adolescence\",\"Aldrich Museum\",\"Anselm Kiefer\",\"art\",\"artists\",\"canvas\",\"contemporary art\",\"Etroits sont les Vaisseaux\",\"installation art\",\"MASS MoCA\",\"oceans\",\"paintings\",\"Revisited\",\"Russian futurism\",\"storms\",\"subprime mortgage crisis\",\"Velimer Chlebnikov\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Revisited\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/\",\"name\":\"Revisited: On Anselm Kiefer\u2019s \u201cVelimir Chlebnikov\u201d\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-04T21:27:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-04T21:50:25+00:00\",\"description\":\"In \u201cRevisited,\u201d writers look back on a work of art they first encountered long ago. Here, Kyle Chayka revisits Anselm Kiefer\u2019s Velimir Chlebnikov.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ruins in Advance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"The Paris Review\",\"description\":\"The best prose, interviews, poetry, and art. Since 1953.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Paris Review\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png\",\"width\":696,\"height\":696,\"caption\":\"The Paris Review\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/parisreview\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/parisreview\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/6daf2f404382fc3cd6c8e84d813d2fc8\",\"name\":\"Kyle Chayka\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/152b6f80bb3e1315b40b05dcea1c7da73ca0689296ee7e6137a61b7391c2a169?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/152b6f80bb3e1315b40b05dcea1c7da73ca0689296ee7e6137a61b7391c2a169?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kyle Chayka\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/author\/kchayka\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Revisited: On Anselm Kiefer\u2019s \u201cVelimir Chlebnikov\u201d","description":"In \u201cRevisited,\u201d writers look back on a work of art they first encountered long ago. Here, Kyle Chayka revisits Anselm Kiefer\u2019s Velimir Chlebnikov.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ruins in Advance by Kyle Chayka","og_description":"April 4, 2017 \u2013 In \u201cRevisited,\u201d writers look back on a work of art they first encountered long ago. Here, Kyle Chayka revisits Anselm Kiefer\u2019s Velimir Chlebnikov.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/","og_site_name":"The Paris Review","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/","article_published_time":"2017-04-04T21:27:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-04T21:50:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1237,"height":550,"url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Kyle Chayka","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@parisreview","twitter_site":"@parisreview","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kyle Chayka","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/"},"author":{"name":"Kyle Chayka","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/6daf2f404382fc3cd6c8e84d813d2fc8"},"headline":"Ruins in Advance","datePublished":"2017-04-04T21:27:07+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-04T21:50:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/"},"wordCount":1001,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg","keywords":["adolescence","Aldrich Museum","Anselm Kiefer","art","artists","canvas","contemporary art","Etroits sont les Vaisseaux","installation art","MASS MoCA","oceans","paintings","Revisited","Russian futurism","storms","subprime mortgage crisis","Velimer Chlebnikov"],"articleSection":["Revisited"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/","name":"Revisited: On Anselm Kiefer\u2019s \u201cVelimir Chlebnikov\u201d","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg","datePublished":"2017-04-04T21:27:07+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-04T21:50:25+00:00","description":"In \u201cRevisited,\u201d writers look back on a work of art they first encountered long ago. Here, Kyle Chayka revisits Anselm Kiefer\u2019s Velimir Chlebnikov.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/2013_mass_moca_anselm_kiefer_hall_art_foundation_052_copy3.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/2017\/04\/04\/ruins-made-in-advance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ruins in Advance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/","name":"The Paris Review","description":"The best prose, interviews, poetry, and art. Since 1953.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#organization","name":"The Paris Review","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tpr-hadada-roundell-logo-square.png","width":696,"height":696,"caption":"The Paris Review"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/parisreview\/","https:\/\/x.com\/parisreview","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/parisreview"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/6daf2f404382fc3cd6c8e84d813d2fc8","name":"Kyle Chayka","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/152b6f80bb3e1315b40b05dcea1c7da73ca0689296ee7e6137a61b7391c2a169?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/152b6f80bb3e1315b40b05dcea1c7da73ca0689296ee7e6137a61b7391c2a169?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kyle Chayka"},"url":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/author\/kchayka\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1149"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109562"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109562\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":109568,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109562\/revisions\/109568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theparisreview.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}