Advertisement
The Paris Review
Subscribe
Sign In
Remember me
Forgot password?
Sign In
Subscribe
The Daily
The Latest
Columns
The Quarterly
Issues
Interviews
Fiction
Poetry
Letters & Essays
Art & Photo
graphy
Authors
Podcast
About
History
Opportunities
Masthead
Prizes
Submissions
Media Kit
Bookstores
Events
Donate
Donate to
The Paris Review
Institutional Support
THE SPRING REVEL
Newsletters
Store
The Paris Review
The Daily
The Latest
Columns
The Quarterly
Issues
Interviews
Fiction
Poetry
Letters & Essays
Art & Photography
Authors
Podcast
About
History
Opportunities
Masthead
Prizes
Submissions
Media Kit
Bookstores
Events
Donate
Donate to
The Paris Review
Institutional Support
THE SPRING REVEL
Newsletters
Store
Sign In
Remember me
Forgot password?
Sign In
Subscribe
Sign In
Remember Me
Forgot password?
Nostalgia for the Future, and Other News
By
Dan Piepenbring
April 9, 2015
On the Shelf
Illustration by Dan McPharlin. Via Beautiful/Decay
Writers love to hate M.F.A.s; they also love to brag about them. Are the degrees worthless? Essential? Expansive? Detrimental to one’s creative impulses? “It’s no surprise that
the promise of the M.F.A.
—to make you, if you’re lucky, a famous, well-paid author—strikes so many people with even the smallest literary dream as utterly irresistible.”
To master the subtleties of another language is no mean feat—and
getting prepositions right
is often the most frustrating part. They can seem entirely arbitrary: “Spaniards dream
with
(not
about
) something. In the unlikely event that Germans schedule something at an approximate time, it is
gegen
(
against
) seven o’clock, not
about
or
around
. The ancient Greeks, progenitors of western logic, had many prepositions that do bizarre double duty to the English eye:
meta
means both
with
and
after
;
kata
means both
according to
and
against
.”
Lydia Davis, meanwhile, has faced struggles of her own
in learning Norwegian
: “You see how you are suddenly able to unlock so many words, just by studying the pattern? Take the words beginning with ‘Hv.’ I guessed they were used in questions: ‘hva’ meaning ‘what’, ‘hvorfor’ meaning ‘why’. But it took me a long time to figure out ‘hvis’ was ‘if.’ ”
Then there are
contranyms, auto-antonyms, antagonyms, Janus words, and/or antiologies
—words that can function as their own opposites. Take
no
, for instance, which increasingly means
yes
. (Only, mind you, in certain situations.)
Dan McPharlin makes art “
derived from blueprints laid down decades earlier
on the pages of battered sci-fi paperbacks, fantasy art books, and mid-century design quarterlies.”
On the “
mind-numbing chatter
” of the art world: “There is a debate about whether or not something ‘posits something about its ability to posit something.’ One critic tells a student, ‘You have to make better paintings fail.’ One exchange between student and critic involves the critic demanding, ‘What does that paint can stand for, in that painting?’ When the student doesn’t reply, the critic continues, ‘Stop squirming! Is there a political implication to this paint can or not?’ ”
Last / Next
Article
Last / Next Article
Share